Was It Worth It? The Democratic Strategy in the 2022 Midterms
In the 2022 midterm elections, Democrats employed a controversial strategy of funding and promoting far-right, Trump-endorsed Republican candidates during the primaries. The rationale was that these extreme candidates would be easier to defeat in the general elections, as they might alienate moderate and independent voters.
Key Instances of Democratic Funding of Trump Candidates:
New Hampshire Senate Race:
The Senate Majority PAC, aligned with Democrats, spent over $3 million to boost Don Bolduc, a far-right candidate, in the Republican primary. Bolduc lost to Democratic incumbent Maggie Hassan in the general election.
Michigan House Race:
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) spent money to promote John Gibbs, a Trump-endorsed candidate, over moderate Republican Peter Meijer. Gibbs won the primary but lost to Democrat Hillary Scholten in the general election.
Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Race:
Democratic candidate Josh Shapiro spent around $840,000 to elevate Doug Mastriano, a far-right candidate, in the Republican primary. Mastriano lost to Shapiro in the general election.
Maryland Gubernatorial Race:
The Democratic Governors Association (DGA) spent over $1 million to support Dan Cox, a Trump-endorsed candidate, in the Republican primary. Cox was defeated by Democrat Wes Moore in the general election.
Illinois Gubernatorial Race:
The DGA and Governor J.B. Pritzker's campaign spent approximately $35 million to promote Darren Bailey, a far-right candidate, in the Republican primary. Bailey lost to Pritzker in the general election.
Outcomes and Criticisms:
The strategy appeared to be successful in many cases, as the far-right candidates promoted by Democrats often lost in the general elections. However, this approach was not without its critics. Some Democrats argued that it was risky and morally questionable, as it involved supporting candidates who held extreme and potentially harmful views. Additionally, there were concerns that this strategy could backfire if any of these far-right candidates managed to win their general elections.
Overall, while the tactic helped Democrats win several key races, it also sparked a debate within the party about the ethics and long-term implications of such a strategy.
Democratic Strategy in 2022 Midterms:
The Democrats' controversial strategy of funding and promoting far-right, Trump-endorsed Republican candidates during the primaries yielded mixed results:
Short-Term Gains: Democrats saw success in several key races where they funded far-right candidates who ultimately lost in the general elections. For example, in New Hampshire, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Illinois, the far-right candidates promoted by Democrats were defeated by Democratic candidates in the general elections.
Risks and Criticisms: The strategy was risky and faced criticism within the Democratic Party. Critics argued that it was morally questionable and could backfire if any of the far-right candidates won their general elections. Additionally, the strategy diverted resources that could have been used for local organizing efforts.
Current 2024 Election Dynamics:
As of mid-2024, the dynamics between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump have shifted significantly, with Trump leading in several key battleground states and even making inroads into traditionally blue states:
Polling Data: Trump leads Biden in crucial swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Biden's support has waned in these states, which he won in 2020, making his path to re-election more challenging.
Blue Wall States: Biden's strategy now focuses on the 'Blue Wall' states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. However, even in these states, the race is tight, with Trump leading or the polls being within the margin of error.
Traditionally Blue States: States like Virginia, New Jersey, and New York, which have been reliably blue, are now showing signs of shifting towards Trump. Virginia, in particular, is on a razor's edge, and polling trends in New Jersey and New York indicate a shift towards Trump.
Contrast and Implications:
Short-Term Gains vs. Long-Term Risks: The short-term gains from the 2022 midterm strategy of promoting far-right candidates have not translated into a stable advantage for Democrats in the 2024 presidential race. The strategy's success in the midterms did not address the underlying issues that are now affecting Biden's re-election campaign.
Voter Dynamics: The current election dynamics show a significant shift in voter patterns. Trump is gaining support among irregular voters, including younger Black and Latino men, who traditionally leaned Democratic. This shift poses a challenge for Biden, who needs to mobilize these voters to secure a win.
Strategic Focus: Biden's focus on the Blue Wall states reflects a defensive strategy aimed at securing the minimum necessary electoral votes. However, the erosion of support in traditionally blue states like Virginia, New Jersey, and New York complicates this strategy and puts additional pressure on his campaign to perform well in these battlegrounds.
While it may have been worth it in 2022. This Democratic strategy yielded some short-term gains, it has not provided a stable foundation for Biden's 2024 re-election campaign. The current polling trends indicate a challenging path ahead for Biden, with Trump leading in key states and making inroads into traditionally blue territories.
Share this post
Nope, 2022 Blue Bet Doesn't Pay Off
Share this post
Was It Worth It? The Democratic Strategy in the 2022 Midterms
In the 2022 midterm elections, Democrats employed a controversial strategy of funding and promoting far-right, Trump-endorsed Republican candidates during the primaries. The rationale was that these extreme candidates would be easier to defeat in the general elections, as they might alienate moderate and independent voters.
Key Instances of Democratic Funding of Trump Candidates:
New Hampshire Senate Race:
The Senate Majority PAC, aligned with Democrats, spent over $3 million to boost Don Bolduc, a far-right candidate, in the Republican primary. Bolduc lost to Democratic incumbent Maggie Hassan in the general election.
Michigan House Race:
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) spent money to promote John Gibbs, a Trump-endorsed candidate, over moderate Republican Peter Meijer. Gibbs won the primary but lost to Democrat Hillary Scholten in the general election.
Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Race:
Democratic candidate Josh Shapiro spent around $840,000 to elevate Doug Mastriano, a far-right candidate, in the Republican primary. Mastriano lost to Shapiro in the general election.
Maryland Gubernatorial Race:
The Democratic Governors Association (DGA) spent over $1 million to support Dan Cox, a Trump-endorsed candidate, in the Republican primary. Cox was defeated by Democrat Wes Moore in the general election.
Illinois Gubernatorial Race:
The DGA and Governor J.B. Pritzker's campaign spent approximately $35 million to promote Darren Bailey, a far-right candidate, in the Republican primary. Bailey lost to Pritzker in the general election.
Outcomes and Criticisms:
The strategy appeared to be successful in many cases, as the far-right candidates promoted by Democrats often lost in the general elections. However, this approach was not without its critics. Some Democrats argued that it was risky and morally questionable, as it involved supporting candidates who held extreme and potentially harmful views. Additionally, there were concerns that this strategy could backfire if any of these far-right candidates managed to win their general elections.
Overall, while the tactic helped Democrats win several key races, it also sparked a debate within the party about the ethics and long-term implications of such a strategy.
Democratic Strategy in 2022 Midterms:
The Democrats' controversial strategy of funding and promoting far-right, Trump-endorsed Republican candidates during the primaries yielded mixed results:
Short-Term Gains: Democrats saw success in several key races where they funded far-right candidates who ultimately lost in the general elections. For example, in New Hampshire, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Illinois, the far-right candidates promoted by Democrats were defeated by Democratic candidates in the general elections.
Risks and Criticisms: The strategy was risky and faced criticism within the Democratic Party. Critics argued that it was morally questionable and could backfire if any of the far-right candidates won their general elections. Additionally, the strategy diverted resources that could have been used for local organizing efforts.
Current 2024 Election Dynamics:
As of mid-2024, the dynamics between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump have shifted significantly, with Trump leading in several key battleground states and even making inroads into traditionally blue states:
Polling Data: Trump leads Biden in crucial swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Biden's support has waned in these states, which he won in 2020, making his path to re-election more challenging.
Blue Wall States: Biden's strategy now focuses on the 'Blue Wall' states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. However, even in these states, the race is tight, with Trump leading or the polls being within the margin of error.
Traditionally Blue States: States like Virginia, New Jersey, and New York, which have been reliably blue, are now showing signs of shifting towards Trump. Virginia, in particular, is on a razor's edge, and polling trends in New Jersey and New York indicate a shift towards Trump.
Contrast and Implications:
Short-Term Gains vs. Long-Term Risks: The short-term gains from the 2022 midterm strategy of promoting far-right candidates have not translated into a stable advantage for Democrats in the 2024 presidential race. The strategy's success in the midterms did not address the underlying issues that are now affecting Biden's re-election campaign.
Voter Dynamics: The current election dynamics show a significant shift in voter patterns. Trump is gaining support among irregular voters, including younger Black and Latino men, who traditionally leaned Democratic. This shift poses a challenge for Biden, who needs to mobilize these voters to secure a win.
Strategic Focus: Biden's focus on the Blue Wall states reflects a defensive strategy aimed at securing the minimum necessary electoral votes. However, the erosion of support in traditionally blue states like Virginia, New Jersey, and New York complicates this strategy and puts additional pressure on his campaign to perform well in these battlegrounds.
While it may have been worth it in 2022. This Democratic strategy yielded some short-term gains, it has not provided a stable foundation for Biden's 2024 re-election campaign. The current polling trends indicate a challenging path ahead for Biden, with Trump leading in key states and making inroads into traditionally blue territories.